When the punch line comes, the energy being expended to suppress inappropriate emotions, such as desire or hostility, is no longer needed and is released as laughter. A third long-standing explanation of humor is the theory of incongruity. People laugh at the juxtaposition of incompatible concepts and at defiance of their expectations—that is, at the incongruity between expectations and reality. According to a variant of the theory known as resolution of incongruity, laughter results when a person discovers an unexpected solution to an apparent incongruity, such as when an individual grasps a double meaning in a statement and thus sees the statement in a completely new light.
These and other explanations all capture something, and yet they are insufficient. They do not provide a complete theoretical framework with a hypothesis that can be measured using well-defined parameters. They also do not explain all types of humor. None, for example, seems to fully clarify the appeal of slapstick. In in the journal Psychological Science, A. Humor results, they propose, when a person simultaneously recognizes both that an ethical, social or physical norm has been violated and that this violation is not very offensive, reprehensible or upsetting.
Hence, someone who judges a violation as no big deal will be amused, whereas someone who finds it scandalous, disgusting or simply uninteresting will not. Experimental findings from studies conducted by McGraw and Warren corroborate the hypothesis. Consider, for example, the story of a church that recruits the faithful by entering into a raffle for an SUV anyone who joins in the next six months. Study participants all judged the situation to be incongruous, but only nonbelievers readily laughed at it.
Levity can also partly be a product of distance from a situation—for example, in time. It has been said that humor is tragedy plus time, and McGraw, Warren and their colleagues lent support to that notion in , once again in Psychological Science.
The recollection of serious misfortunes a car accident, for example, that had no lasting effects to keep its memory fresh can seem more amusing the more time passes. Geographical or emotional remoteness lends a bit of distance as well, as does viewing a situation as imaginary. In another test, volunteers were amused by macabre photos such as a man with a finger stuck up his nose and out his eye if the images were presented as effects created with Photoshop, but participants were less amused if told the images were authentic.
Conversely, people laughed more at banal anomalies a man with a frozen beard if they believed them to be true. McGraw argues that there seems to be an optimal comic point where the balance is just right between how bad a thing is and how distant it is.
Several other theories, all of which contain elements of older concepts, try to explain humor from an evolutionary vantage. Gil Greengross, an anthropologist then at the University of New Mexico, noted that humor and laughter occur in every society, as well as in apes and even rats. This universality suggests an evolutionary role, although humor and laughter could conceivably be a byproduct of some other process important to survival.
Wilson is a major proponent of group selection, an evolutionary theory based on the idea that in social species like ours, natural selection favors characteristics that foster the survival of the group, not just of individuals. Wilson and Gervais applied the concept of group selection to two different types of human laughter.
You sail a boatload of young women dressed only in fishing nets down the Nile and urge the pharaoh to go catch a fish. Answer: A key. Be it ancient or modern day humour, we all find different things funny — why is this? Is it down to our brains or to the ways that humour works? One consistent finding in scientific studies is that laughter is universal and predates humans , while humour seems to appear alongside modern humans — wherever there is a record of modern humans, one finds jokes.
Even the topics seem modern — such as fart jokes and sex gags. These themes also confirm some of the scientific theories of jokes and humour. For example, humour often involves the realisation of incongruity mismatch between a concept and a situation, violations of social taboos or expectations, the resolution of tension or mocking and a sense of superiority here, over those stupid Aberdites!
But, even if jokes tend to be structured in a certain way, over time and place no one thing is guaranteed to make everyone laugh. A perfect example of this condition is that of a man who's admitted in a hospital and making everyone laugh with his out of character jokes and puns, but at the same time unable to find humour in it. So, if everyone in the room is laughing at your frequent puns, sexual jokes or pointless stories, almost always at an inappropriate time, chances are that you might have a medical condition called Witzelsucht.
Source: giphy. Source: ageonicsmedical. We met Wiseman in London, and he had nothing good to say about this zinger. This makes sense. And Dumb and Dumber is as stupid as it gets. Tig Notaro is incredibly skilled in the Seinfeld Strategy, pointing out the absurdity in the stuff that most people take for granted.
Plus, Tig Notaro is magical. She makes everything funny. Have you seen the bit where she does nothing but push a stool across a stage, and yet still the audience is loving it? In that case, art trumps science. Wait, you want two geeky white guys to explain what makes a Key and Peele sketch involving convoluted African-American names funny?
0コメント